China India Japan Korea Southeast Asia Economy Politics
Home Security Feature
Security · Exclusive

Why Lowering Global Oil Prices Remains an Elusive Goal

Why Lowering Global Oil Prices Remains an Elusive Goal
Security · 2026
Photo · Huang Wei for Asian Examiner
By Huang Wei Security & Defense Jun 3, 2026 4 min read

Despite President Donald Trump's assurances that a peace agreement with Iran is imminent, the price of crude oil remains stubbornly high—about 40% above levels seen in late February, when the conflict began. Even as ceasefire talks ebb and flow, the fundamental forces keeping oil expensive are proving remarkably resilient.

The Strait of Hormuz: Iran's Primary Leverage

Iran's ability to threaten the Strait of Hormuz—the narrow waterway through which roughly 20% of the world's oil passes—remains its strongest bargaining chip in negotiations. Tehran has demonstrated it can effectively close the strait, and no agreement is likely to see them surrender that leverage entirely. Even if Iran formally agrees to keep the strait open, it retains the capacity to disrupt shipping again at will.

This dynamic directly impacts energy markets across Asia, from Tokyo to New Delhi. Japan, which imports nearly all its oil, has seen its trade balance worsen as energy costs surge. The Bank of Japan now faces a difficult choice between supporting growth and containing inflation fueled by higher energy prices.

Infrastructure Damage Will Take Years to Repair

Even if a political settlement is reached tomorrow, the physical damage to Middle Eastern oil infrastructure ensures that supply constraints will persist. Mines must be swept from the strait—a process that will take weeks. Shut-in oil wells require months to resume production. Refineries, pipelines, and other facilities hit by the conflict will take years to fully repair.

This timeline matters profoundly for Asian economies. India, the world's third-largest oil consumer, has seen its fuel import bill balloon, straining the rupee and forcing the Reserve Bank of India to reconsider its monetary policy stance. Southeast Asian nations like Indonesia and Vietnam, which rely heavily on imported refined products, are also feeling the pinch.

Negotiating Stalemate: Who Blinks First?

The talks themselves remain deadlocked, with each side convinced it can outlast the other. Trump's team believes the severe damage inflicted on Iran's economy will force Tehran to accept unfavorable terms. Iranian negotiators, meanwhile, calculate that Trump cannot afford to enter the midterm elections with gasoline prices at current levels.

This standoff has broader implications for US alliances in Asia. The Quad's structural resilience is being tested as member states—Japan, India, Australia, and the United States—grapple with divergent energy security priorities. While Washington focuses on containing Iran, Tokyo and New Delhi are exploring alternative supply routes and strategic petroleum reserves.

The Geopolitical Web: Russia, China, and Ukraine

The conflict is further complicated by Russia's material and intelligence support for Iran. Critics of Trump's approach note that his warm relationship with Vladimir Putin has yielded little leverage to stop this assistance. Putin could counter that he will halt aid to Iran only when the US stops supporting Ukraine—a trade-off Washington is unlikely to accept.

China, meanwhile, plays a more ambiguous role. Chinese-made drone components are used by all parties in both the Iran and Ukraine conflicts, from Russian and Ukrainian forces to Iranian and even American systems. Beijing's dual role as both a potential mediator and a supplier of critical technology underscores the complexity of the Indo-Pacific energy landscape.

Military Options and Their Limits

If diplomacy fails, Trump could escalate militarily—renewing bombing campaigns, attempting to seize Iran's uranium stockpile, or using US Navy forces to forcibly open the Strait of Hormuz. Each option carries significant risks and uncertain outcomes. A naval escort operation would likely involve bloodshed and is not guaranteed to succeed.

Should it work, however, it would strip Iran of its primary negotiating tool: the ability to keep global oil prices high by bottling up the strait. Iran would be unable to export its own oil, potentially starving the regime into concessions on its nuclear program.

For now, Iran maintains its chokehold on the strait, and the effects reverberate from the pump in Jakarta to the trading floors of Singapore. Until either a comprehensive agreement is reached or a decisive military action changes the calculus, high oil prices will remain a feature of the global economy—and a persistent headache for Asian policymakers.

More from this story

Next article · Don't miss

Shangri-La Shockwave: End of Automatic Assurance Reshapes Japan's Security

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore signaled a shift from automatic security guarantees to transactional partnerships. Japan is responding by boosting defense spending, expanding co-production, and building minilat

Read the story →
Shangri-La Shockwave: End of Automatic Assurance Reshapes Japan's Security